We build your CI Debt Audit from your public footprint: the hours your engineers lose waiting on CI, what those hours cost at loaded salaries, and what coding agents do to that number over the next twelve months.
“Fast, reliable CI is a necessary part of a well-functioning engineering team, especially with the amount of code being generated today.”
Example output. Yours is built for your domain.
Three deterministic scans feed the model before any estimate is calculated. Every claim on the finished audit carries the source it came from.
Detected from your public web and DNS fingerprint, then labelled as detected, inferred, or assumed. We show you which one it was.
Estimated from live engineering job postings and public company data. The basis line on the audit tells you exactly how the number was reached.
Modeled from team size and typical run frequency, then projected forward against an agent-driven cadence.
Most CI bills are not paying for work. They are paying to redo work that has not changed, on machines sized for the largest step in the pipeline.
Every push pays the full cost again.
Unchanged work is never re-run. The flaky step replays on its own.
Every number below is published on rwx.com with a named customer behind it.
RWX is super fast. It executes jobs quickly, caching works incredibly well, and it's all very hands-off. But most importantly, the cost savings have held as our usage has scaled.
Fast, reliable CI is a necessary part of a well-functioning engineering team, especially with the amount of code being generated today. With RWX, the tools have been there to keep the feedback loop moving.
Deployments that once took multiple hours, even up to an entire day, and required multiple engineers are now 20-minute, one-person workflows.
RWX was built by engineers for engineers, and it shows in how fast and hands-off CI feels day to day. Our runtimes are down to 10 minutes.
Switching to RWX for CI not only enabled us to accelerate feedback loops, it helped our developers regain confidence shipping larger, more ambiguous changes.
RWX singlehandedly changed how our team approaches the development cycle. Our engineers fully trust the platform, and our CI/CD pipeline has never been faster.
So most teams do not do it in one move. Tropic ran RWX alongside GitHub Actions until they trusted the results, then cut over. ClickFunnels got their starting config delivered as a single file to commit. If your pipelines are deeply wired into another platform, the honest answer is that the port takes real work, and the parallel run is how you find out whether it is worth it before you commit to anything.
RWX is named after the read, write, execute permissions in computer file systems. Dan founded it after two tours as a CTO, where he spent years on the wrong side of a build platform that could not keep up with the team using it.
He wrote publicly about how hard the CI/CD problem turned out to be, and why RWX shipped later than planned. That is the person on the second call.
Once you have the audit, fifteen minutes with Collin to walk the numbers and tell us which assumptions are wrong. If it holds up, the next conversation is with Dan.
It lands in your inbox shortly. Grab a slot now and Collin will walk you through it, assumption by assumption. Skip this and the audit still arrives.